By Neevio · Sources checked 4 October 2026
A comparison written by Neevio using our built product and the linked official vendor pages. It is not an independent review or a claim of hands-on testing of every competitor feature.
The main difference.
Linear centres on software product development, from planning to issues and cycles. Neevio connects project delivery with client agreements, scope decisions, time records and invoicing. Start with the question your team needs to answer: what should we build next, or what did this client agree to and what can we bill?
Review Linear's official product information →Compare the workflow.
| Workflow | Neevio | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Planning | Tasks, epics, sprints, project documents and delivery planning. | Issues, projects, cycles and initiatives for product development. |
| Incoming work | Intake review connected to tasks; commercial scope reviewed separately. | Customer requests and workplace request intake. |
| Client scope | Source agreement, reviewed baseline, scope flags and client change decisions. | Evaluate how your agreement and client approval process connects to the issue workflow. |
| Time and billing | Time entries, timesheet review, invoices and recorded project profitability. | Check your required time-tracking and billing connections during the trial. |
Capabilities and availability depend on the plan. Where a workflow needs verification, the table asks you to test it instead of treating an unverified capability as missing.
Product roadmap or client delivery?
A product team may organise work around initiatives and release priorities. A service team also needs to know which client agreement covers that work. Choose a representative project before comparing the interfaces.
In Neevio, tasks, epics and sprints organise execution. For client work, the engagement adds deliverables, exclusions and source references. Evaluate whether the people assigning work can find the agreement without leaving the delivery conversation.
A customer request is the start of a decision.
Customer feedback can explain why a task matters. For a fixed-price client project, you also need a decision about whether the requested change is included, chargeable or still ambiguous.
Neevio's intake and scope review address separate questions. An accepted request can become planned work; a reviewed baseline and change request record its commercial context. Test both decisions rather than treating a new backlog item as client approval.
Follow the approved change through to billing.
Use an example such as a client adding member accounts to an agreed website build. Record the estimate, ask for the client's decision, assign the approved work and inspect the time records before preparing an invoice.
Neevio keeps time tracking, invoice preparation and project profitability in the workspace. Review the same scenario in Linear with the services your team already uses. Compare the number of handoffs and the evidence retained; this comparison does not assume that an integration is unavailable.
Which product fits your team?
Shortlist Linear when product planning, issue execution and the engineering team's existing workflow are your main requirements. Keep the current setup if your client and billing systems already handle commercial decisions well.
Shortlist Neevio when developers deliver paid client projects and need source agreements, scope decisions, approved changes, time and invoices alongside the work.
For Neevio, AI proposals and scope flags require human review, integration availability is limited to the supported connectors, and profitability reflects recorded time and rates. Validate the security requirements and operational capabilities your organisation needs; a marketing comparison does not establish that every enterprise requirement is met.
Compare annual subscription costs.
The examples below use 10 paid seats and annual billing. They are base subscription calculations before applicable taxes, add-ons or connected services, not equivalent feature bundles. All prices shown are in USD. Compare the included capabilities, limits and add-ons alongside the subscription cost.
- Neevio Basic: $5.00 per user/month, billed annually. Ten seats: $600.00 per year.
- Neevio Business: $9.00 per user/month, billed annually. Ten seats: $1,080.00 per year.
- Linear Basic: $10.00 per user/month, billed annually. Ten seats: $1,200.00 per year.
- Linear Business: $16.00 per user/month, billed annually. Ten seats: $1,920.00 per year.
Neevio Free includes unlimited members, two projects and 250 tasks. Basic includes five projects and unlimited tasks; Business includes unlimited projects and tasks. Confirm the capabilities and limits on the current pricing page.
Linear also offers Free and custom Enterprise plans. Its pricing page lists some AI capabilities as requiring AI credits. Confirm the plan and credits needed for your workflow.
Pilot a project before migrating.
Map issues to tasks and review how projects, cycles and planning groups should fit Neevio's projects, sprints and epics. Move one active project first. Preserve source issue links and verify attachments, comments, assignees and states before treating the migration as complete.
Use an agreed website build with one new client request. Find the original agreement, review the scope impact, record the client's decision, assign the approved work and reconcile its time with the invoice. Ask the delivery owner and billing reviewer to explain the same chain.
Use the full agency software evaluation checklist →